RandomForest vs PLS comparison, cross-validated, with applicability domain and Y-randomization.
Consensus features from active compounds (3D) with labeled feature images.
Features from crystal structure binding site (if PDB available).
Multiple hypotheses ranked by enrichment (AUC-ROC, EF, BEDROC).
All compounds screened against the best hypothesis using 3D Kabsch alignment.
View the pharmacophore in your browser with labeled feature spheres.
0.5 = random, >0.7 = good, >0.9 = excellent discrimination of actives from decoys.
Enrichment Factor at 1% — how many more actives in the top 1% vs random (EF=5 means 5x better).
Cross-validated R² of the QSAR model (>0.5 acceptable, >0.7 good).
3D alignment score (0-1) — fraction of features matched × alignment quality.